Pulmonary Embolism

Evaluation

Risk Stratification

Per the ESC 2019 Guidelines, patients are separated into High, Intermediate-High, Intermediate-Low, or Low risk for early mortality.

High-Risk, or Massive PE

Intermediate Risk, or Submassive PE

Low-Risk

RV Assessment

Either with echocardiography or CT angiography.

Resuscitation of PE

  1. Volume management
  2. Early vasopressors (NE) +/- inotropes (dobutamine)
  3. Consider thrombolysis
  4. Avoid intubation
  5. Consider ECMO for refractory cases

Treatment Strategy

Massive PE

Submassive/Intermediate Risk PE

Intermediate-High

Intermediate-Low

Anticoagulation alone.

Low-Risk PE

Anticoagulation alone.

Subsegmental PE

What is the takeaway?

As of 2022, if the patient has a single SSPE and no particular risk factors for recurrence or decompensation (active cancer, cardiopulmonary poor dysfunction, completely unprovoked), and bilateral compression US is negative for DVT, then it is reasonable to consider no anticoagulation and close monitoring instead (with perhaps repeat ultrasounds in 2-3 weeks).

Thrombolysis

Massive PE

Intermediate Risk PE

While not routinely considered, thrombolysis can be considered for patients on anticoagulation who are decompensating or have higher risk of early mortality, anticoagulation treatment.

Some studies (particularly PEITHO) have examined thrombolysis in submassive PE and generally find no balanced benefit from thrombolysis (perhaps improved hemodynamic or pulmonary hypertension status, against increased bleeding risk). The MOPETT study used a particular regimen of tPA 0.5 mg/kg (up to a max of 50 mg) given as a 10 mg bolus followed by the remainder over 2 hours (i.e. reduced dose) for a particular definition of submassive PE ("moderate", with few patients having RV dysfunction); it showed that the risk of pulmonary hypertension was reduced compared to anticoagulation alone.

PEITHO (NEJM 2014)

Among patients with submassive PE being treated with unfractionated heparin, administration of tenecteplase (30-50 mg IV once over 5-10 seconds) reduces a composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or hemodynamic decompensation at 7 days when compared to placebo, though this was driven by reduced hemodynamic decompensation. Tenecteplase was associated with increased rates of major extracranial bleeding at 7 days (6.3% vs. 1.2%; P<0.001; NNH 20) and strokes at 7 days (2.4% vs. 0.2%; P=0.004; NNH 45).

Cardiac Arrest

Anticoagulation

Special Populations

References

  1. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS) | European Heart Journal | Oxford Academic
  2. Submassive & Massive PE - EMCrit Project
  3. UptoDate
  4. Eight pearls for the crashing patient with massive PE